Tails

#1 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-04 09:55:47

• related to Bug #9563: FAQ: torrents with Tails -> use i2p added

#3 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-05 07:22:17

• Assignee set to emmapeel
• QA Check set to Dev Needed
• Feature Branch set to emmapeel:bugfix/9894-i2p_permissions

#4 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-05 10:10:14

• % Done changed from 0 to 30
• QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Ready for QA

Until Bug #8280 is fixed, I guess, it is needed.

I copied and changed a little the phrasing from known issues page, adding steps and links.

please review

#5 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-05 10:10:34

• related to Bug #8280: Users should be able to manipulate local files in I2P browser added

#6 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-05 10:10:49

• related to deleted (Bug #9563: FAQ: torrents with Tails -> use i2p)

#7 Updated by emmapeel 2015-08-05 10:12:16

• Assignee deleted (emmapeel)

#8 Updated by BitingBird 2015-08-05 10:52:52

• Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress

#9 Updated by BitingBird 2015-08-05 10:53:11

• Target version set to Tails_1.6

#10 Updated by intrigeri 2015-08-05 13:25:57

• Assignee set to BitingBird

BitingBird, do you want to do a first pass of review before it goes to sajolida?

#11 Updated by BitingBird 2015-08-11 03:03:29

• Assignee changed from BitingBird to sajolida
• % Done changed from 30 to 50

Looks good to me, please review another time and merge :)

#12 Updated by sajolida 2015-08-17 11:29:38

• Assignee changed from sajolida to emmapeel
• QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Info Needed

Thanks for working on this. I understand that you copied and slightly adapted what we already have in the support/known_issues.html#index28h2. Was your idea to move all this information from the known issues into the main documentation? Because if so, they you have forgotten to remove it from the known issues. If not, then I’m not convinced by so much duplication and would rather use an inline to do have the same content displayed twice.

Also, it seems like kytv wants to solve Bug #8280 in time for 1.6, so maybe it’s not worth putting more effort and time into this doc that will hopefully be removed by then.

Once you clarified your intent and whether you think it’s still worth working on this, I’ll do a more detailed review.

#14 Updated by bertagaz 2015-09-23 01:30:13

• Target version changed from Tails_1.6 to Tails_1.7

#15 Updated by intrigeri 2015-12-14 09:44:24

• Target version changed from Tails_1.7 to Tails_2.0

Postponing to a release that’s in the future. Please seize this as an opportunity to check if and when you think you’ll have time to work on this again :)

#16 Updated by emmapeel 2016-01-06 09:52:26

• Assignee changed from emmapeel to sajolida
• QA Check changed from Info Needed to Ready for QA

Ok, it looks like Bug #8280 is taking a little bit more time.

I have removed the information from the Known Issues page, I think it belongs to the I2P page.

Please review topic branch

#17 Updated by sajolida 2016-01-15 19:43:06

• related to Bug #9563: FAQ: torrents with Tails -> use i2p added

#19 Updated by sajolida 2016-01-15 19:44:33

• related to deleted (Bug #9563: FAQ: torrents with Tails -> use i2p)

#20 Updated by sajolida 2016-01-15 19:44:35

• blocks Bug #9563: FAQ: torrents with Tails -> use i2p added

#21 Updated by sajolida 2016-02-01 10:52:47

• Priority changed from Normal to Elevated
• Target version changed from Tails_2.0 to Tails_2.2

#22 Updated by sajolida 2016-02-01 16:53:32

• Assignee changed from sajolida to emmapeel

Sorry for the delay. Here are a few comments:

• Try to use markdown indentation instead of code (something like 4 space
  but maybe more if you’re indented already).
• Say ‘start’ instead of ‘boot’
• Use something to explain what your command lines do. “They need to
  belong” is maybe not clear enough. What about “Execute the following
  command to change the ownership of your files”.
• You have a placeholder in your chown commands. I suggest either
  getting rid of it with * (if that’s suitable) or explain that it’s a placeholder like
  we’re doing in /doc/first_steps/installation/manual/linux.
• Maybe use “`” around Unix user names?
• I think we’re usually saying “Tor Browser” (and not “the Tor
  Browser”) and I see that on this page we’re saying inconsistently
  “the I2P Browser” or “I2P Browser”. I suggest using “I2P Browser”
  only if it works. And yeah, we’re saying “the Unsafe Browser”, but
  maybe that’s because “unsafe” is an adjective.
• You’re missing in “Exchanging files with
  the I2P Browser”.

#23 Updated by emmapeel 2016-02-10 18:51:05

• QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Dev Needed

#25 Updated by emmapeel 2016-02-17 13:45:44

• Assignee changed from emmapeel to sajolida
• QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Info Needed

Ok, applied all changes except the s/start/boot. Review now, or maybe after your answer :)

#26 Updated by sajolida 2016-03-07 15:10:41

• Target version changed from Tails_2.2 to Tails_2.3

#27 Updated by sajolida 2016-03-17 16:46:18

• Assignee changed from sajolida to emmapeel
• Priority changed from Elevated to Normal
• QA Check changed from Info Needed to Ready for QA
• Feature Branch changed from emmapeel:bugfix/9894-i2p_permissions to doc/9894-i2p-permissions

Thanks. I did a bunch more commits with 39879c1..8fe92b3. Please have a look and tell me if we’re ready for merging!

#28 Updated by anonym 2016-05-08 05:10:28

• Target version changed from Tails_2.3 to Tails_2.4

#29 Updated by emmapeel 2016-05-19 14:41:37

• Assignee deleted (emmapeel)

Looks good to me!

#30 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-20 17:44:15

• Assignee set to sajolida
• QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

#31 Updated by sajolida 2016-05-30 14:41:48

• Status changed from In Progress to Duplicate
• Assignee deleted (sajolida)
• % Done changed from 50 to 100
• QA Check deleted (Pass)

Merged!