Feature #8864
Consider flagging first boot after installing
0%
Description
That would be useful to take people by the hand and go forward with either:
- Clone temporary Tails to minimal Tails.
- Upgrading back their original device.
- Configuring persistence.
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - Feature #14534: Improve UX when Wi-Fi is not working | Confirmed | 2017-12-29 |
History
#1 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-04 22:29:23
- Description updated
#2 Updated by sajolida 2015-05-05 15:32:55
Note that proposing to clone a temporary Tails comes in different scenarios than configuring persistence. Actually both options are self-exclusive. If ever we can detect that a device is a temporary Tails we could instead start Tails Installer directly (or even lock other usages) as suggested by Lunar in https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-ux/2015-May/000388.html.
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2015-07-06 13:36:54
- Assignee set to sajolida
- QA Check set to Ready for QA
Report from the monthly meeting:
“We tried to answer this question: ”is it OK that a given Tails device
has written, somewhere, whether it has been started already?"
a) if I root your Tails, what does it give me to know whether it’s the
first time it’s booted?
and
b) if I steal your Tails, what does it give me to know whether it’s been started yet?
and we didn’t find any serious risks in doing so, except it proves
that a given Tails device has been used (which might entail more
legal risks than mere possession), which seemed overkill a threat
model to us."
=> sajolida, I guess you’ll want to do what you want with this outcome, on Redmine or elsewhere :)
#4 Updated by sajolida 2015-08-03 03:28:37
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
sajolida) - QA Check deleted (
Ready for QA)
I don’t think there’s nothing in our roadmap that relies on this. But now that we have this decision it could allow us to propose to advertise better persistence. But I don’t think we have this idea tracked anywhere, so I’m marking this as resolved.
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2016-02-18 22:30:36
I don’t know where to write this since there is apparently no follow-up to the discussion we had, but still: https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/disk-format documents exactly how they do it with the 64-bit Attributes field that any GPT partition entry has, so it should be pretty easy.
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2019-01-23 11:07:32
- related to Feature #14534: Improve UX when Wi-Fi is not working added