Feature #17151
Point Tails Upgrader to /doc/upgrade
0%
Description
It was renamed in d3ced622fa to make our documentation index easier to read.
The redirection in Feature #17146 will take care of older Tails versions so it’s not super urgent.
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | ||
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2016-01-08 | |
Related to Tails - |
Resolved |
History
#1 Updated by sajolida 2019-10-11 18:03:52
- Status changed from Confirmed to Needs Validation
- Assignee deleted (
sajolida) - Feature Branch set to iuk.git:feature/17151-rename-doc-url
#2 Updated by sajolida 2019-10-11 18:04:21
- related to
Feature #17146: Redirect /doc/first_steps/upgrade/ to /doc/upgrade added
#3 Updated by sajolida 2019-10-11 18:04:32
- related to
Feature #10885: Better integrate new upgrade scenarios with upgrade documentation added
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-14 08:33:05
- Assignee set to intrigeri
- Target version set to Tails_4.0
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-14 12:12:47
- Target version deleted (
Tails_4.0)
Given it’s not super urgent, it might wait until 4.1.
#6 Updated by sajolida 2019-10-18 02:35:00
- related to
Feature #16991: Cognitive walkthrough of automatic and manual upgrades added
#7 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-22 16:04:20
- Target version set to Tails_4.1
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-24 08:27:26
- Status changed from Needs Validation to In Progress
@sajolida, I’m wondering about the #manual part, for the same reason I explained on the tails-dev list a couple days ago. I think it’s exactly the same question that we’re trying to answer there:
- Either we want users who need to do a manual upgrade to land on top of /upgrade so they get a chance to read the common intro, and then we should not append #manual to the link here either.
- Or we want to avoid one extra navigation hop and instead point to #manual (as done on this branch), but then we should do this in the release notes too.
Makes sense?
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-24 08:27:48
- Assignee changed from intrigeri to sajolida
#10 Updated by sajolida 2019-10-25 06:58:50
Answered on tails-dev. Plus, I think it’s fine for manual upgraders to
miss the intro because it contains only information that they will get
anyway when starting from #manual.
#11 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-31 12:09:36
- Status changed from In Progress to Needs Validation
- Assignee changed from sajolida to intrigeri
Deal!
#12 Updated by intrigeri 2019-10-31 17:31:52
- Status changed from Needs Validation to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
intrigeri)
Released in tails-iuk 4.0.2-1, that’ll be part of Tails 4.1.
Note that in this context, unfuzzying PO files is a waste of your time: Transifex only pulls the POT file so these translations will be fuzzy anyway next time we import them, unless translators do the same work that you did.