Bug #15621

devel branch FTBFS since virtualbox 5.2.12-dfsg-2 was uploaded to sid

Added by intrigeri 2018-05-26 09:30:46 . Updated 2018-06-10 12:59:44 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Elevated
Assignee:
Category:
Virtualization
Target version:
Tails_3.7.1
Start date:
2018-05-26
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
bugfix/15621-virtualbox
Type of work:
Code
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 virtualbox-guest-x11 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-24

Files

2018-05-27_15-41.png (13920 B) lamby, 2018-05-27 14:42:43
2018-05-27_15-51.png (16308 B) lamby, 2018-05-27 14:51:19

Subtasks

Related issues

Related to Tails - Bug #12048: Check what to do with VirtualBox on Stretch Resolved 2016-12-20
Blocks Tails - Feature #15139: Core work 2018Q2: Foundations Team Resolved 2018-01-01

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-26 09:31:01

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-26 09:34:10

As per Bug #12048#note-12, for now “we’ll import the last working version in our custom APT repo”. Let’s see if it works with our recent kernel.

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-26 09:37:33

  • Feature Branch set to bugfix/15621-virtualbox
  • Type of work changed from Research to Code

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-26 09:43:17

  • related to Bug #12048: Check what to do with VirtualBox on Stretch added

#5 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-26 16:18:52

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to lamby
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

lamby, can you please review this? The nature of the review is exactly the same as Bug #15616 so 0.5 hour maximum should be enough as well so I’ll only paste the info that differs here:

$ reprepro list bugfix-15621-virtualbox        
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-dkms 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-guest-source 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-guest-utils 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-guest-x11 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-qt 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|amd64: virtualbox-source 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|i386: virtualbox-dkms 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|i386: virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|i386: virtualbox-guest-source 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|i386: virtualbox-source 5.2.12-dfsg-1
bugfix-15621-virtualbox|contrib|source: virtualbox 5.2.12-dfsg-1

#6 Updated by lamby 2018-05-27 14:52:26

This ISO does not actually boot for me (see qemu screenshot attached).

However, I can confirm that the squashfs image does indeed contain 5.2.12-dfsg-1 which matches https://deb.tails.boum.org/dists/bugfix-15621-virtualbox/contrib/binary-amd64/Packages (see other screenshot)

(Leaving as “Ready for QA” due to boot - just in case there is another issue…)

#7 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-28 07:11:41

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix committed
  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to lamby

> This ISO does not actually boot for me (see qemu screenshot attached).

Interesting! Do other Tails ISO images usually boot for you in that environment?

> However, I can confirm that the squashfs image does indeed contain 5.2.12-dfsg-1 which matches https://deb.tails.boum.org/dists/bugfix-15621-virtualbox/contrib/binary-amd64/Packages (see other screenshot)

Thanks! Merged the branch into devel to fix the FTBFS and then we’ll see if it boots in our CI setup. If it does not I’ll file another ticket about that other problem.

#8 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-28 07:14:40

  • % Done changed from 50 to 90

#9 Updated by lamby 2018-05-28 07:59:24

  • Assignee changed from lamby to intrigeri

intrigeri wrote:

> Interesting! Do other Tails ISO images usually boot for you in that environment?

Usually yes (!) but juuuust rechecking with the official 3.1 ISO it
also does not boot so I have some kind of regression in my ISO
testing setup.

(Seems I need to pass -machine accel=kvm here.. Weird.)

Sorry about that hiccup :) Re-assigning back, leaving at 90% (was that for the ISO issue?)

#10 Updated by intrigeri 2018-05-28 08:40:33

  • Assignee deleted (intrigeri)
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

An ISO built from devel boots fine on our CI (libvirt/QEMU) so I’ll call this a local problem with your virtualization setup.

#11 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-09 15:29:22

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.8 to Tails_3.7.1

#12 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-10 12:57:25

  • Assignee set to BitingBird

#13 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-10 12:58:29

  • Assignee deleted (BitingBird)

#14 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-10 12:59:44

  • Status changed from Fix committed to Resolved