Tails

#1 Updated by segfault 2018-01-25 13:03:10

• related to Feature #15225: Iteration 2: Show unlocked VeraCrypt file containers in GtkPlacesSidebar added

#2 Updated by segfault 2018-01-25 16:03:23

• Subject changed from Upstream support for file containers in GtkPlacesSidebar to Iteration 2: Upstream support for file containers in GtkPlacesSidebar

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2018-04-14 07:54:39

• related to Feature #14467: Upstream VeraCrypt support in GNOME Files added

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-29 09:00:56

• Description updated
• Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress

#6 Updated by segfault 2018-08-05 19:05:08

• Description updated

Today I got an explanation to why https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/merge_requests/200 was rejected. I created new merge requests for GVfs and GTK (see description).

#9 Updated by segfault 2018-08-09 12:45:36

• Assignee changed from segfault to intrigeri
• QA Check set to Info Needed

intrigeri wrote:
> I’d like to avoid shipping in Tails a patchset that’s quite different from what we’ve submitted upstream, so please give yourself a ticket about replacing our obsolete patches with the new ones once they’re merged upstream.

Not sure why you are raising this here, it seems unrelated to me. But anyway:

For GTK I will have to build a new package anyway. But if I also replace our patches in GLib, then we will have to rebuild pretty much everything else too, which is why I didn’t do it yet, and didn’t plan to, unless there were important changes, which there were not. Do you think it’s worth it?

#10 Updated by intrigeri 2018-08-09 13:11:09

• Assignee changed from intrigeri to segfault
• QA Check changed from Info Needed to Dev Needed

> Not sure why you are raising this here, it seems unrelated to me.

Right, it’s kinda unrelated (although the upstreaming process is what made our current patches obsolete). I did this because my other option was to reopen the relevant sibling ticket to comment there and I suspected you would not like it much. But indeed, if this requires more discussion we should do that in order to avoid hijacking this ticket :)

> For GTK I will have to build a new package anyway. But if I also replace our patches in GLib, then we will have to rebuild pretty much everything else too, which is why I didn’t do it yet, and didn’t plan to, unless there were important changes, which there were not. Do you think it’s worth it?

I don’t think it’s worth doing now but I do think it’s worth doing once the new patch series has been accepted upstream.

#13 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-05 16:26:58

• Target version changed from Tails_3.9 to Tails_3.10.1

#14 Updated by segfault 2018-10-23 22:39:35

• Target version changed from Tails_3.10.1 to Tails_3.11

#15 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2018-12-16 13:57:26

• Target version changed from Tails_3.11 to Tails_3.12

#16 Updated by anonym 2019-01-30 11:59:18

• Target version changed from Tails_3.12 to Tails_3.13

#17 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2019-03-20 14:34:06

• Target version changed from Tails_3.13 to Tails_3.14

#19 Updated by segfault 2019-04-12 13:53:23

• Description updated
• Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
• Assignee deleted (segfault)
• QA Check deleted (Dev Needed)

intrigeri wrote:
> The two MRs in this ticket’s description were merged \o/
>
> I assume next steps are:
>
> # submit a MR that backports the code to GTK 3 and get it merged

Did that and it was already merged.

> # update our packages as discussed above (possibly only for Buster?)

We only need to backport this for Buster, the packages for Stretch already include a patch which adds lists file containers in the GtkPlacesSidebar. I’m doing the backporting for Buster as part of Bug #16634, so I think we can mark this ticket as resolved.

#21 Updated by intrigeri 2019-05-05 08:23:53

• Target version changed from Tails_3.14 to Tails_3.13.2

#22 Updated by anonym 2019-05-06 15:03:13

• Target version changed from Tails_3.13.2 to Tails_3.14

#23 Updated by intrigeri 2019-05-06 18:15:37

• Target version changed from Tails_3.14 to Tails_3.13.2