Feature #10614
Rethink the terminology around "temporary" Tails
0%
Description
- Rephrase “temporary” Tails as “intermediary” Tails [11]
- Popover to explain temporary Tails [11]
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - |
Rejected | 2017-06-15 |
History
#1 Updated by sajolida 2015-11-24 01:46:12
- Description updated
#2 Updated by sajolida 2015-11-24 02:47:32
- Parent task set to
Feature #8590
#3 Updated by sajolida 2015-11-24 03:26:49
- Description updated
#4 Updated by sajolida 2015-12-09 06:31:40
- Description updated
- Assignee changed from sajolida to tchou
- QA Check set to Ready for QA
- Feature Branch set to web/10614-temporary-terminology
#5 Updated by sajolida 2015-12-09 06:38:26
That’s ready for review. Beware:
- I didn’t do the CSS of the toggle and I suggest you work on this on the same branch.
- I’m not 100% convinced by the wording “Why 2” and “Why another one”, tell me what you think and feel free to propose something else.
#6 Updated by tchou 2015-12-12 03:13:45
- Assignee changed from tchou to sajolida
We talked about about popover, but I think it might be better to do a tooltip (so you don’t have to click to have the information).
Anyway, I think that the popover or the tooltip as to be on a content that is already there (like “2 USB sticks”), and a special styling says it’s possible to have extra-information.
Ack on wording.
#7 Updated by tchou 2015-12-12 03:14:09
- Assignee changed from sajolida to tchou
#8 Updated by tchou 2015-12-12 05:12:39
- Assignee changed from tchou to sajolida
- QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass
I pass, the popover issues will be elsewhere.
#9 Updated by sajolida 2015-12-16 09:50:45
- Assignee changed from sajolida to tchou
- Target version changed from Tails_1.8 to Tails_2.0
- QA Check changed from Pass to Dev Needed
Could you clarify on this ticket where is “elsewhere”? I propose to add a blocking relationship between this elsewhere ticket and this one. For the time being, I’d rather avoid merging CSS-broken stuff, so I’m assigning this to you until the CSS issues are solved (probably elsewhere as you said).
And postponing as 1.8 is over.
#10 Updated by tchou 2015-12-16 10:11:56
- blocked by
Feature #10627: Setup a first Popover mecanism with explaining other device added
#11 Updated by tchou 2015-12-19 15:02:34
+ Setup a first Popover
#12 Updated by tchou 2015-12-19 15:02:44
- blocks deleted (
)Feature #10627: Setup a first Popover mecanism with explaining other device
#13 Updated by tchou 2015-12-19 16:09:19
- Assignee changed from tchou to sajolida
- QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Ready for QA
- Finaly it’s not a popover but a simple toggle (as parts of the website are designed to be used by touch devise, it’s better not to have too much mouse_over things). Done in 3c6dd165c4e95bf31153ee12336c53ab9c9c542e (web/10617-explain-verification).
#14 Updated by sajolida 2015-12-23 06:42:00
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
sajolida) - QA Check deleted (
Ready for QA)
Merged then.
#15 Updated by sajolida 2017-07-10 18:25:22
- related to
Bug #12717: Clarify "intermediary Tails" on /upgrade/tails/ added