Bug #9960

Request tracker for help desk

Added by sajolida 2015-08-10 11:29:24 . Updated 2018-09-07 11:19:22 .

Status:
Confirmed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Infrastructure
Target version:
Start date:
2015-07-24
Due date:
% Done:

67%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Research
Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description


Subtasks

Feature #9803: Call for a meeting to refine requirements for help desk request tracker Resolved

0

Bug #11745: Talk to people from Tor about RT as request tracker for our help desk Rejected

0

Feature #15922: Feasibility study on request tracker for help desk Confirmed

0


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #12262: Make WhisperBack logs available to developers to query Rejected 2017-02-25

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri 2015-08-11 01:11:41

  • Subject changed from Request tracker to Request tracker for frontdesk

#2 Updated by sajolida 2016-08-29 10:55:36

  • Subject changed from Request tracker for frontdesk to Request tracker for help desk

#3 Updated by elouann 2017-03-11 05:16:36

  • Blueprint set to https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/RT_for_help_desk/

#4 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-18 14:30:36

  • related to Feature #12262: Make WhisperBack logs available to developers to query added

#5 Updated by sajolida 2018-09-07 10:53:09

  • Subject changed from Request tracker for help desk to Feasibility study of request tracker for help desk

All the subtasks here are about evaluating options on what to build, when, and for how much money. So let’s repurpose this ticket to be about a “feasibility study”.

The next step is for our sysadmins to update their plans and budget in 2019Q2.

#6 Updated by sajolida 2018-09-07 11:07:26

  • Subject changed from Feasibility study of request tracker for help desk to Feasibility study on request tracker for help desk

#7 Updated by sajolida 2018-09-07 11:15:54

  • Subject changed from Feasibility study on request tracker for help desk to Request tracker for help desk

Nah, I’ll create a dedicated ticket for the feasibility study instead…