Bug #9256
Don't restart Tor after setting the right clock
0%
Description
IIRC we’re restarting Tor after setting the right clock, because it’s not able to recover when it was started with a skewed clock. There’s been progress upstream about that. We should check if we can get rid of some 20-time.sh
ugliness thanks to these changes.
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - Feature #5774: Robust time syncing | In Progress | 2015-05-17 | |
Blocked by Tails - Bug #16471: Drop time synchronization hacks that tor 0.3.5 and 0.4.x made obsolete | In Progress | 2019-02-17 |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2015-04-17 09:34:00
- Assignee set to anonym
anonym, is this something that you would happily look into while “procrastinating”, perhaps?
#2 Updated by sajolida 2015-09-07 10:41:53
- related to Feature #5774: Robust time syncing added
#3 Updated by sajolida 2015-09-22 07:47:37
- Target version deleted (
Sustainability_M1)
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2019-05-18 06:46:33
- related to Bug #16471: Drop time synchronization hacks that tor 0.3.5 and 0.4.x made obsolete added
#5 Updated by hefee 2019-05-21 22:31:52
It looks like this is solved together with Bug #16471.
#6 Updated by hefee 2019-05-21 22:33:08
- related to deleted (
Bug #16471: Drop time synchronization hacks that tor 0.3.5 and 0.4.x made obsolete)
#7 Updated by hefee 2019-05-21 22:33:11
- blocked by Bug #16471: Drop time synchronization hacks that tor 0.3.5 and 0.4.x made obsolete added
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-11 16:58:39
hefee wrote:
> It looks like this is solved together with Bug #16471.
Not quite, unfortunately: more recent progress suggests we’ll still have to set the clock from the Tor consensus in some cases.
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-11 17:00:05
- Assignee deleted (
anonym)
#10 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-11 17:17:11
- Description updated
- Assignee set to intrigeri
I’ll try this.
#11 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-11 18:16:25
- Assignee deleted (
intrigeri)
“Scenario: Clock is one day in the future in bridge mode” fails, but that’s probably the problem I’ve mentioned on Bug #16471#note-46, so it does not teach us anything here. Later.