Feature #9131
Write regressions tests for updated device list in Tails installer
100%
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2015-01-13 | |
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2014-12-01 | |
Blocks Tails - |
Resolved | 2015-03-30 |
History
#1 Updated by anonym 2015-03-30 11:30:00
- related to
Bug #8691: Installer lists devices after they have been unplugged added
#2 Updated by anonym 2015-03-30 11:30:23
- related to
Bug #8353: Installer status still says "Unable to find any USB drive" after plugging in a suitable drive added
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2015-03-30 11:36:59
- Parent task set to
Feature #8542
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2015-03-30 11:37:27
- blocks #8538 added
#5 Updated by anonym 2015-03-30 11:39:39
The following commits in the bugfix/8691-and-6538
branch contains some WIP for this:
- 9a96aae814416a0370324c818b307e1628a96c54
- ee4ebdff1b3d0615f6797772a68d046cdc2748a4
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2015-04-08 09:21:01
- Subject changed from Write regressions tests for updated device list in Tails installer. to Write regressions tests for updated device list in Tails installer
#7 Updated by kytv 2015-04-10 01:14:34
- Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
#8 Updated by kytv 2015-04-12 17:36:11
- blocks
Feature #9129: Write regression tests for installing Tails to too small devices added
#9 Updated by kytv 2015-04-12 17:36:44
- Assignee changed from kytv to intrigeri
- % Done changed from 0 to 30
- QA Check set to Ready for QA
- Feature Branch set to kytv:test/9131-tails-installer-device-list
#10 Updated by intrigeri 2015-04-14 12:42:46
- Assignee changed from intrigeri to anonym
#11 Updated by anonym 2015-04-15 12:53:18
- Assignee changed from anonym to kytv
- QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Dev Needed
The code looks good, and this shouldn’t be affected by the issue mentioned in Feature #9129#note-10. However, I find the Scenario title not so good. It should tell a bit more about what the context is. Also, it tests both plugging and unplugging.
#12 Updated by kytv 2015-04-20 22:20:56
- Assignee changed from kytv to anonym
- QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Ready for QA
anonym wrote:
> The code looks good, and this shouldn’t be affected by the issue mentioned in Feature #9129#note-10. However, I find the Scenario title not so good. It should tell a bit more about what the context is. Also, it tests both plugging and unplugging.
It seems I missed updating that when I pulled in the `WIP` commits. Updated and pushed.
#13 Updated by kytv 2015-05-05 14:26:55
Applied in changeset commit:05e36ea33dd6750b048cbb42a6602b399a654120.
#14 Updated by anonym 2015-05-05 14:26:55
- Status changed from In Progress to Fix committed
- % Done changed from 30 to 100
Applied in changeset commit:5d29441fe76970b07b967f4d795f9c6af47b5cb4.
#15 Updated by anonym 2015-05-05 14:27:29
- Assignee deleted (
anonym) - QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass
Looks great! Merged!
#16 Updated by BitingBird 2015-05-12 18:40:40
- Status changed from Fix committed to Resolved