Bug #8929

Make it clear that virtualization instructions are for Debian starting from Jessie

Added by sajolida 2015-02-21 13:01:07 . Updated 2015-02-27 15:58:36 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Virtualization
Target version:
Start date:
2015-02-21
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
End-user documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

Apparently some of them don’t work on Wheezy and our documentatio is ambiguous about that. So let’s make it clear that people are expected to run Debian Jessie.

And let’s try to guest whether it works in Ubuntu 14.04.

Subtasks

History

#1 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-21 13:01:48

  • Description updated

#2 Updated by Tails 2015-02-21 15:35:32

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress

Applied in changeset commit:6de882313c1fad6d1947788feff4649217336032.

#3 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-21 15:36:27

  • Status changed from In Progress to Confirmed
  • Assignee changed from sajolida to mercedes508
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA
  • Feature Branch set to web/7417-add-iso-size

What do you think about 6de8823?

#4 Updated by Tails 2015-02-22 17:59:47

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress

Applied in changeset commit:c094951f57e52491c8ecbcb7e96be3fa8d3c63a0.

#5 Updated by Tails 2015-02-25 13:34:50

Applied in changeset commit:455f838d9c032da9630983b4b67d5e147f2f990d.

#6 Updated by mercedes508 2015-02-27 11:55:14

  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

Fine with me that way. Thanks.

#7 Updated by Tails 2015-02-27 15:15:03

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset commit:f969cdc4b7cdc1e2e6767468d1e525d7495ead9b.

#8 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-27 15:16:47

  • Assignee deleted (mercedes508)
  • % Done changed from 100 to 0
  • QA Check deleted (Pass)
  • Feature Branch deleted (web/7417-add-iso-size)

The branch information of this ticket was obviously wrong. I tried to find out on which branch did I do 6de8823 but git branch --contains 6de8823 didn’t return anything. So I cherry-picked it and it’s now called f969cdc.

#9 Updated by intrigeri 2015-02-27 15:58:36

> The branch information of this ticket was obviously wrong. I tried to find out on which branch did I do 6de8823 but git branch --contains 6de8823 didn’t return anything.

Maybe that’s because all commit IDs have changed since we’ve rewritten history?