Bug #8881

Explain how to access HD when it's a LVM volume

Added by BitingBird 2015-02-08 17:15:43 . Updated 2015-06-26 12:50:58 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2015-02-08
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
End-user documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitly_asked.mdwn -> the note about LVM being “more complicated” could be explained.

Pertinent discussion from Feature #5636:

Regarding LVM, what happens by default?

-> Nothing useful when a PV appears (e.g. after unlocking a dm-crypt volume that hosts a PV).

what happens if you run vgchange -ay?

-> Then the VG and all LVs in there appear. Maybe they can even be mounted from GNOME Disks (not sure).


Subtasks


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #8949: Rework /doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitly_asked Confirmed 2015-02-24
Blocked by Tails - Feature #5636: Document how to access internal hard disks Resolved

History

#1 Updated by BitingBird 2015-02-08 17:15:59

  • blocked by Feature #5636: Document how to access internal hard disks added

#2 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-08 19:42:32

A bit more testing would be required to be sure how Tails behaves. Then if we think this is outside of our goals we could point to external doc maybe.

#3 Updated by BitingBird 2015-02-08 20:15:40

  • Priority changed from Normal to Low

#4 Updated by emmapeel 2015-06-10 08:47:44

Maybe this bug can be closed? I can read an explanation to open LVMs at

https://tails.boum.org/doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitly_asked/

I don’t think we need to add the whole process as the Disk Utility GUI is quite simple, where you need to:

- Unlock the device

- Start the Volume
- Mount it

Is the bug open because this information is supposed to go there? I think it may be too much for that page…

#5 Updated by emmapeel 2015-06-10 08:49:11

  • related to Feature #8949: Rework /doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitly_asked added

#6 Updated by emmapeel 2015-06-10 09:31:14

  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

#7 Updated by sajolida 2015-06-10 11:38:18

  • Assignee set to BitingBird
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Info Needed

Yeah, what’s in https://tails.boum.org/doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitly_asked/ is fine with me. Maybe we forgot with BitingBird to close this ticket as well when working on a related one… BitingBird can you check as you wrote that note (if I remember correctly)?

#8 Updated by BitingBird 2015-06-10 18:39:07

  • Assignee deleted (BitingBird)
  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

I didn’t know the exact steps that emmapeel listed in comment 4, so I couldn’t document it then. I still think it would be useful to add them to the page, don’t you think?

#9 Updated by BitingBird 2015-06-10 19:24:23

  • Assignee set to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

#10 Updated by sajolida 2015-06-26 12:50:58

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)
  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

I think that the page is fine as it is. If you want to be sure about that, then I suggest you try to open the encrypted Debian system on your internal hard disk from Tails and see how it goes. Then feel free to reopen this ticket if you think that’s not easy enough and makes sense as part of our doc.