Feature #8822

Package ISO verification Firefox extension for Debian

Added by sajolida 2015-01-29 15:59:18 . Updated 2017-07-10 22:06:34 .

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2015-01-29
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Debian
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description


Subtasks


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #8581: Analyse and simplify the installation and upgrade workflows Resolved 2014-04-07
Blocked by Tails - Bug #7552: Firefox extension to automatically verify the ISO checksum Resolved 2015-01-06

History

#1 Updated by BitingBird 2015-01-29 16:18:39

  • Subject changed from Packages Firefox extension for Debian to Package Firefox extension for Debian

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2015-01-29 16:22:37

  • Assignee set to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

I guess this ticket lacks a proper parent ticket, and maybe a clearer title, or something.

#3 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-02 14:14:21

  • blocked by Bug #7552: Firefox extension to automatically verify the ISO checksum added

#4 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-02 14:14:34

  • related to Feature #8581: Analyse and simplify the installation and upgrade workflows added

#5 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-02 21:04:41

  • Subject changed from Package Firefox extension for Debian to Package ISO verification Firefox extension for Debian

I didn’t want to put it as a subticket of Bug #7552 not to block it. Now I tried to clarify the title.

#6 Updated by sajolida 2015-02-05 21:27:19

  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)

#7 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 16:57:51

  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

#8 Updated by Anonymous 2017-06-30 12:37:36

  • Assignee deleted (None)

We should first open an RFP on the Debian bugtracker. I can handle that.

#9 Updated by intrigeri 2017-06-30 13:18:26

  • Assignee set to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

Wait: why do we want this, exactly? I see no explanation anywhere on this ticket, so I find it hard to do any kind of cost/benefit analysis.

#10 Updated by sajolida 2017-07-10 22:06:34

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected
  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)
  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

You’re right!