Feature #8672
Evaluate how libguestfs in Jessie supports the usecases we have for it
100%
Description
(Can be done with command-line tools, not necessarily with the Ruby bindings, even if the latter would save time for the next steps.)
Subtasks
Related issues
Blocked by Tails - |
Resolved | 2015-01-10 | |
Blocks Tails - |
Resolved | 2015-01-10 |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2015-01-10 18:04:26
- blocked by
Feature #8671: List the usecases we could have for libguestfs in the automated test suite added
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2015-01-10 18:08:38
- blocks
Feature #8673: Use ruby-guestfs wherever it's worth it in the automated test suite added
#3 Updated by anonym 2015-01-28 13:26:59
FWIW, libguestfs (and ruby-guestfs) works fine in Wheezy after this workaround:
echo "^openrc" | sudo tee -a /usr/lib/guestfs/excludelist
sudo update-guestfs-appliance
#4 Updated by kytv 2015-02-03 22:42:11
anonym wrote:
> FWIW, libguestfs (and ruby-guestfs) works fine in Wheezy after this workaround:
> […]
FTR, this does not seem to be necessary for libguestfs from Jessie, Sid, or Experimental. Indeed, update-guestfs-appliance
does not exist on my (mostly Debian Sid with some experimental) box.
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2015-02-07 14:10:30
- Assignee changed from kytv to anonym
- QA Check set to Info Needed
This is marked as a blocker for Feature #8673. What’s the status? Should this ticket be closed, or what?
#6 Updated by anonym 2015-02-10 11:56:56
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
anonym) - Target version changed from Tails_1.4 to Tails_1.3
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- QA Check changed from Info Needed to Pass
intrigeri wrote:
> This is marked as a blocker for Feature #8673. What’s the status? Should this ticket be closed, or what?
Yeah, my tests are good.