Feature #8301

Document how to configure a Riseup account in Claws

Added by sajolida 2014-11-24 19:29:15 . Updated 2015-04-25 06:03:50 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
sajolida
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2014-11-24
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
bitingbird:doc/8301-riseup_claws
Type of work:
End-user documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Email Client
Deliverable for:

Description

That’s quite popular and would be nice to be documented upstream: https://help.riseup.net/en/email/clients


Subtasks


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #8305: Evaluate shipping Claws Mail 3.11.1+ Rejected 2014-11-26
Related to Tails - Feature #7694: Document email client Resolved 2014-07-31

History

#1 Updated by emmapeel 2014-11-25 10:48:36

While testing this I could not find a way to configure TLS on Claws mail.

From their docs, I see gnutls implemented:

  • Use ‘gnutls_priority’ hidden account preference for POP3 and
    STARTTLS connections, in addition to SMTP. (27th October 2014 http://www.claws-mail.org/news.php )
    and some bug reports about the Windows version of claws on their bug tracker:

http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962

But I cannot configure TLS for the accounts, just StartTLS which is not recommended by riseup:

https://help.riseup.net/en/email/clients/thunderbird#enhance-your-email-security

I will find out more about this on the Claws users mailing list:

http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/011592.html

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2014-11-25 11:11:44

pop3s is known to be broken with Wheezy’s Claws Mail since Riseup disabled SSLv3 there.
imaps works fine for me.

#3 Updated by emmapeel 2014-11-26 08:28:27

According to Claws mail developers, ‘If you want to be fully in control and exact in your requirements’ there is a big difference between Claws mail 3.11.1 and 3.8 which is shipped with Tails. With the newer version, I could configure TLS like

gnutls_set_priority=1
gnutls_priority=NONE:+VERS-TLS1.0:+VERS-TLS1.1:+VERS-TLS1.2

See the thread at http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/011593.html

Claws mail 3.11.1 is on Debian testing. https://packages.debian.org/jessie/claws-mail

Apparently the changes on the security aspects are big.

See https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8305 for discussion on this

#4 Updated by emmapeel 2014-11-26 08:41:53

  • related to Feature #8305: Evaluate shipping Claws Mail 3.11.1+ added

#5 Updated by BitingBird 2014-12-03 20:38:15

#6 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 17:56:48

  • Assignee changed from emmapeel to BitingBird

Seems like Riseup documented it: https://help.riseup.net/en/email/clients/claws

I can add it to https://tails.boum.org/doc/anonymous_internet/claws_mail/ now that it exists, if we think it’s relevant :)

#7 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-11 19:01:31

  • Assignee changed from BitingBird to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

So, do you think I should add the link? That’s a common problem for users.

#8 Updated by sajolida 2015-04-14 16:32:22

  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)
  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

I’m not sure.

  • On the one hand, we don’t want to build up a list of all email providers in the world and link to their configuration pages.
  • On the other hand, I don’t know many email providers who document Claws.

So feel free to do so if you want.

#9 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-14 16:55:29

  • Assignee set to BitingBird
  • Target version set to Tails_1.4

#10 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-14 18:52:03

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
  • Feature Branch set to bitingbird:doc/8301-riseup_claws

#11 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-14 19:05:09

  • Assignee changed from BitingBird to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

Added a sentence. Built, looks good. Please review :)

#12 Updated by sajolida 2015-04-24 14:21:59

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset commit:af22d99358e2bce454a8f0423282a8b000458267.

#13 Updated by sajolida 2015-04-24 14:27:14

  • QA Check deleted (Ready for QA)

Merged, thanks. It was only missing a tiny bit of markup (9ca3361).

#14 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-25 06:03:50

Thanks for the review !