Feature #7924
FAQ: Explain that users are not supposed to edit torrc
100%
Description
That’s a pretty frequent one, with different arguments:
* exclude nodes
* force exit nodes from a given country
See https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#ChooseEntryExit
Subtasks
History
#1 Updated by sajolida 2014-09-21 12:33:01
- Description updated
#2 Updated by emmapeel 2014-11-17 10:13:36
Bump. I really would like to have an explanation on the website, so I can point our users to it. Many people wants to edit the .torrc
Cheers
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2014-11-17 10:16:24
emmapeel wrote:
> Bump. I really would like to have an explanation on the website, so I can point our users to it. Many people wants to edit the .torrc
Propose a patch? :)
#4 Updated by sajolida 2014-11-19 09:10:55
- Assignee set to emmapeel
Indeed, and that’s on your plate already, see: https://tails.boum.org/contribute/working_together/roles/front_desk/
“Improve the FAQ incrementally based on the work done by email, and do whatever small tasks will make the frontdesk job’s easier in the future.”
#5 Updated by emmapeel 2014-11-19 11:55:06
‘We own our silences, but are enslaved by our words’…
Problem is that I don’t really know what to say about the .torrc. Let me test a reasoning:
- Many programs important to Tails rely and edit this configuration
- Tails is tailored to people that doesn’t know so much about internet security and they could make a mistake, putting themselves at risk
Something along those lines?
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2014-11-19 12:31:32
> Problem is that I don’t really know what to say about the .torrc. Let me test a reasoning:
> - Many programs important to Tails rely and edit this configuration
> - Tails is tailored to people that doesn’t know so much about internet security and
> they could make a mistake, putting themselves at risk
> Something along those lines?
I think pointing to the “We recommend you do not use these” part of https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#ChooseEntryExit should be enough. Not sure it’s worth making a more general point about editing torrc
, apart of “it’s not supported, use at your own risks”.
#7 Updated by sajolida 2014-11-30 01:04:22
You could get inspired by the tone of https://tails.boum.org/support/faq/#index9h2.
#8 Updated by BitingBird 2015-01-07 16:57:57
- Category set to Tor configuration
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2015-01-10 09:49:38
- Subject changed from FAQ: Explain users are not supposed to edit torrc to FAQ: Explain that users are not supposed to edit torrc
- Affected tool deleted (
FAQ)
Any news on that one?
#10 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 19:32:45
emmapeel, do you still plan to work on this, or can I steal it from you?
#11 Updated by emmapeel 2015-04-21 03:19:38
So, what about:
How can I make sure my connection does not look like coming from certain country?
————————————————————————————————————————-
As mentioned in the Tor Browser [FAQ](https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#ChooseEntryExit),
using ExcludeExitNodes is not recommended by Tor because “overriding the entry / exit nodes can mess up your anonymity in ways we don’t understand”.
Editing the rest of the Tor Browser configuration file is possible as a root user, but it is not advised.
(On the FAQ, after ‘Can I install other add-ons in Tor Browser’)
#12 Updated by intrigeri 2015-04-21 04:22:20
> So, what about:
Perhaps you intended to change assignee and QA check fields?
#13 Updated by emmapeel 2015-04-21 04:26:51
- Assignee changed from emmapeel to sajolida
- QA Check set to Ready for QA
Yes, indeed!
#14 Updated by sajolida 2015-04-28 03:15:50
- Assignee changed from sajolida to BitingBird
- Feature Branch set to faq/7924-torrc
Thanks for the patch, I created a branch to work on that and improved it a bit.
I’m now marking it for review by BitingBird who surely faces such questions quite often, to see if we’re missing something.
#15 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-28 03:46:38
- Assignee changed from BitingBird to sajolida
- QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass
Looks good :) I’m really glad this will be documented !
sajolida, would you apply it?
#16 Updated by sajolida 2015-04-28 05:16:37
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset commit:c1629e33d6d85a626d0896f7097e42bdc854b1d7.
#18 Updated by intrigeri 2015-04-28 16:37:15
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
#19 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-29 12:31:56
- Target version set to Tails_1.4