Bug #7099

Broken link

Added by BitingBird 2014-04-16 14:38:47 . Updated 2014-04-17 07:50:33 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2014-04-16
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
End-user documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
0
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

https://tails.boum.org/doc/encryption_and_privacy/gpgapplet/decrypt_verify/index.fr.html

At the bottom of the page, the link is broken (and “differentes sessions” requires a s on sessions).


Subtasks


History

#1 Updated by BitingBird 2014-04-16 14:38:59

  • Subject changed from Lien cassé to Broken link

#2 Updated by matsa 2014-04-16 15:59:30

A fix is available in matsa/master, commit ac685ee.

About the broken link, I just move the line break, I hope this will be enough.

Thanks for reporting!

Cheers

#3 Updated by matsa 2014-04-16 16:09:06

Tested locally, and moving the line break does the trick.

Another broken link was found on another page, this is fix in matsa / master commit e9a8342

(in such situation, should I ask for a review somewhere else?)

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2014-04-16 16:33:22

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

matsa wrote:
> Tested locally, and moving the line break does the trick.
>
> Another broken link was found on another page, this is fix in matsa / master commit e9a8342

Merged, thanks.

> (in such situation, should I ask for a review somewhere else?)

Ideally, a review by another member of your translation team is good to have.
In this specific case, it was trivial for me to have a look and merge.
If you feel a review by another member of your translation team is not needed, please at least mark the ticket as ready for QA, and assign e.g. to me.

#5 Updated by matsa 2014-04-16 17:13:46

intrigeri wrote:
> matsa wrote:
> > Tested locally, and moving the line break does the trick.
> >
> > Another broken link was found on another page, this is fix in matsa / master commit e9a8342
>
> Merged, thanks.

Thanks!

> > (in such situation, should I ask for a review somewhere else?)
>
> Ideally, a review by another member of your translation team is good to have.
> In this specific case, it was trivial for me to have a look and merge.
> If you feel a review by another member of your translation team is not needed, please at least mark the ticket as ready for QA, and assign e.g. to me.

As a user, I can’t do such operations.

(by the way, normal users can’t even edit their own posts.
Is that on purpose, or should I open a ticket ?)

#6 Updated by intrigeri 2014-04-16 18:06:10

> As a user, I can’t do such operations.

You now have Developer credentials on this project, and should be able to perform such operations :)

> (by the way, normal users can’t even edit their own posts.
> Is that on purpose, or should I open a ticket ?)

That’s on purpose. I guess e.g. you don’t want anyone to edit their posts e.g. after someone else replies.

#7 Updated by matsa 2014-04-17 07:50:33

intrigeri wrote:
> > As a user, I can’t do such operations.
>
> You now have Developer credentials on this project, and should be able to perform such operations :)

Wahoo, thanks!

> > (by the way, normal users can’t even edit their own posts.
> > Is that on purpose, or should I open a ticket ?)
>
> That’s on purpose. I guess e.g. you don’t want anyone to edit their posts e.g. after someone else replies.

Yes of course, I understand now

Cheers