Feature #6198
Have AppArmor support stacked filesystems
Start date:
2013-07-27
Due date:
2014-08-24
% Done:
100%
Description
The current plan is to use aliases as a workaround, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/888077
Subtasks
Feature #6199: Test AppArmor aliases patch | Resolved | intrigeri | 0 |
||
Feature #6201: Wait for fixed AppArmor alias patch | Rejected | intrigeri | 0 |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2013-12-08 16:21:49
- Target version set to Hardening_M1
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2013-12-08 16:22:25
- Target version changed from Hardening_M1 to Sustainability_M1
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2014-08-02 14:28:53
- blocks Feature #7724: Sandbox I2P added
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2014-10-05 06:10:56
- blocked by deleted (
)Feature #5385: Have 3 AppArmor profiles in enforce mode
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2014-10-05 06:26:40
- blocked by deleted (
Feature #7724: Sandbox I2P)
#6 Updated by sajolida 2014-10-14 15:12:13
- blocked by #8117 added
#7 Updated by sajolida 2014-10-14 15:12:32
- blocks deleted (
#8117)
#8 Updated by sajolida 2014-10-14 15:12:46
- blocks #8117 added
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2014-10-20 12:39:43
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
As explained in our design doc:
- the alias rules way was actually not the best option;
- it is actually doable to support AppArmor in Tails, without alias rules nor special support from upstream.
So I’m calling this done.