Feature #6169

Give examples explaining how to contribute

Added by bertagaz 2013-07-19 06:45:26 . Updated 2018-08-19 09:34:31 .

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2013-07-19
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Contributors documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
0
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

Small tips on how to hack on differents stuffs in Tails, so that people can quickly get some clues about it.
For example a simple example about how to add a package in Tails:

`echo cowsay >> config/chroot_local-packageslists/tails-common.list`

This was decided during the “How to get more contributors” discussion at the 2013 summit.


Subtasks


History

#1 Updated by bertagaz 2013-07-19 07:09:05

  • Status changed from New to Confirmed

#2 Updated by sajolida 2013-09-29 01:52:47

  • Starter set to No

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2014-07-19 15:37:39

  • Type of work changed from Website to Documentation

#4 Updated by BitingBird 2015-01-11 01:11:23

  • Type of work changed from End-user documentation to Contributors documentation

#5 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 23:06:32

  • related to Feature #6165: Improve visually the Contribute section added

#6 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 23:12:49

  • related to deleted (Feature #6165: Improve visually the Contribute section)

#7 Updated by BitingBird 2015-04-10 23:13:29

#8 Updated by sajolida 2015-09-11 09:33:34

That’s not “visually improve” so it’s out-of-scope for Feature #6165.

#9 Updated by Anonymous 2018-08-19 09:02:49

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected

I have the slight feeling that this ticket is much too vague. We have implemented quite some things since 2013. Such as improved the contribute page, improved our translation documentation and added a list of possible mentors for possible projects to work on. Hence I’m rejecting this ticket. Reopen it if you don’t agree with my reasoning.

#10 Updated by intrigeri 2018-08-19 09:34:31

> I have the slight feeling that this ticket is much too vague.

Agreed!