Feature #5875
Make sure all the Python 3 libraries we need are in Jessie
100%
Description
Check and report before Q2 2014 if all the libraries we need to convert our custom Python software to Python 3 are in Jessie
Subtasks
Feature #6175: List Python 3 libraries we need that are missing in Debian Jessie | Resolved | alant | 100 |
||
Feature #7788: Update pycountry in Debian to support Python 3 | Resolved | 100 |
|||
Feature #7789: Package python3-configobj | Resolved | 0 |
|||
Feature #7790: Package Isis' python-gnupg | Rejected | 0 |
|||
Feature #7791: Investigate the need for python-gnutls | Resolved | 100 |
Related issues
Related to Tails - Feature #5958: Port our custom software to Python 3 | In Progress | 2015-08-24 | |
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | ||
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2015-05-01 |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2013-07-19 09:38:51
- Subject changed from check whether all the libraries we need are in Python 3 to Make sure all the Python 3 libraries we need are in Jessie
- Type of work changed from Test to Code
- Starter set to No
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2013-07-19 09:39:12
- Due date set to 2014-05-31
#3 Updated by BitingBird 2014-06-20 13:41:04
- blocked by
Bug #7423: Have what we need included in Debian Jessie added
#4 Updated by BitingBird 2014-06-20 13:44:08
- blocks deleted (
)Bug #7423: Have what we need included in Debian Jessie
#5 Updated by BitingBird 2014-06-20 13:44:26
- Parent task set to
Bug #7423
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2014-06-20 14:06:30
- related to deleted (
Feature #5958: Port our custom software to Python 3)
#7 Updated by intrigeri 2014-06-20 14:06:51
- related to Feature #5958: Port our custom software to Python 3 added
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2014-06-29 10:19:11
- Blueprint set to https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/python3/
#9 Updated by maker 2014-06-30 20:13:32
Hi,
I’m writing this to notify that the proposition “StringIO: no Python 3 in Debian” in [0] is not truly exact:
the `StringIO` module is included in the stdlib, and available in python3 as `io.StringIO` or `io.BytesIO`.
Moreover, as far as I can tell the `io` module have been backported in python >= 2.6 [1].
Therefore, I think this specific case concerns only the Tails installer source code.
Shall I open another issue for this? If so, would you mind posting the exact files including `StringIO`?
[0] <https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/python3/>
[1] <https://docs.python.org/2/library/stringio.html#module-StringIO>
#10 Updated by intrigeri 2014-07-01 11:54:18
> I’m writing this to notify that the proposition “StringIO: no Python 3 in Debian” in [0] is not truly exact:
> the `StringIO` module is included in the stdlib, and available in python3 as `io.StringIO` or `io.BytesIO`.
Thanks for the input! Feel free to edit the blueprint directly next time, it’s editable online.
> Shall I open another issue for this?
Not needed, since there’s actually no problem to solve :)
> If so, would you mind posting the exact files including `StringIO`?
Tails Installer lives in https://git-tails.immerda.ch/liveusb-creator
Cheers!
#11 Updated by maker 2014-07-05 10:56:24
>> If so, would you mind posting the exact files including `StringIO`?
> Tails Installer lives in https://git-tails.immerda.ch/liveusb-creator
Thank you.
Porting pycountry to python3 have been quite straightfoward, my solution resides in
<http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pycountry/pycountry_0.14.1+ds1-3.1.dsc>.
Shall I open a new issue on bugs.debian.org and look for mentors, or what?
Not sure this mentoring thing applies in this case.
—
m.
#12 Updated by intrigeri 2014-07-07 09:34:24
> Porting pycountry to python3 have been quite straightfoward, my solution resides in
> <http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pycountry/pycountry_0.14.1+ds1-3.1.dsc>.
I notice upstream has already done this work in the 0.15 release: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pycountry/
Did you backport their changes, or did you do it anew?
Maybe the best path forward would be to file a wishlist bug against the pycountry package, asking the maintainers to package the latest upstream release (or at least 0.15+). Of course, doing that work yourself / ourselves and submitting it to the maintainer would be appreciated :)
#13 Updated by maker 2014-07-11 14:27:39
- cross fingers * <https://bugs.debian.org/754364>
Thanks for your help so far, intrigeri.
#14 Updated by intrigeri 2014-07-12 10:09:29
> * cross fingers * <https://bugs.debian.org/754364>
Thanks a lot! I’ve usertagged that bug “for-jessie” so that it’s on our radar.
#15 Updated by intrigeri 2014-07-20 16:39:16
- related to
Feature #5701: Port Tails Greeter to Python 3 added
#16 Updated by BitingBird 2014-07-24 20:23:55
- Target version set to Tails_1.2.1
#17 Updated by intrigeri 2014-08-16 23:35:56
- Target version changed from Tails_1.2.1 to Tails_1.2
Actually, 1.2.1 will be out after the freeze, so rescheduling. Having this done for 1.2 is quite late already, given the current state of the NEW queue.
#18 Updated by maker 2014-08-29 16:00:55
As of today, python3-pycountry and python3-configobj are available in debian unstable.
I’ve update the wiki accordingly.
The only ones surviving now are `python-gnupg` and `gnutls`.
Concerning the latter, I see in whisperback::
$ git grep gnutls
ChangeLog: * CA certificates handeling with libgnutls
debian/control:Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, python-gnupginterface, python-gnutls, python-gtk2, python-webkit
setup.py: requires=['gtk', 'GunPGInterface', 'gnutls'],
whisperBack/mail.py:import gnutls.errors
whisperBack/mail.py: from gnutls.crypto import X509Certificate
whisperBack/mail.py: from gnutls.connection import ClientSession, X509Credentials
whisperBack/mail.py: except gnutls.errors.OperationWouldBlock:
whisperBack/mail.py: except gnutls.errors.OperationWouldBlock:
whisperBack/mail.py: except gnutls.errors.OperationWouldBlock:
Python3 provides the `ssl` module in standard library, that can probably assolve the same functionalities. Moreover, it has been backported also to python2’s standard library. Would it be appreciated a patch removing pygnutls as dependency?
#19 Updated by maker 2014-08-29 16:07:04
redmine@labs.riseup.net writes:
[sry]
> I’ve update the wiki accordingly.
*updated
> Python3 provides the `ssl` module in standard library, that can
> probably assolve the same functionalities. Moreover, it has been
*absolve
> backported also to python2’s standard library. Would it be appreciated
> a patch removing pygnutls as dependency?
Specifically, `ssl` is available on python >= 2.6.
<https://docs.python.org/2/library/ssl.html>
—
m.
#20 Updated by intrigeri 2014-08-29 17:44:46
maker wrote:
> Would it be appreciated a patch removing pygnutls as dependency?
Replied on Feature #7791, that I therefore assigned to you :)
#21 Updated by intrigeri 2014-09-14 20:37:10
- Assignee set to alant
- QA Check set to Info Needed
This task seems completed to me. Alan, any reason you see to keep it around?
#22 Updated by alant 2014-09-15 14:21:51
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- QA Check deleted (
Info Needed)
#23 Updated by intrigeri 2015-05-01 06:59:02
- related to
Feature #9311: Update status of Python 3 migration added