Feature #5335

Persistence: categorized presets

Added by Tails 2013-07-18 07:39:15 . Updated 2018-01-21 12:12:16 .

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Persistence
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
User interface design
Blueprint:

Starter:
0
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

At t-p-s configure step, sort items by category: personal data, app configuration, advanced.

Subtasks

Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #14548: Fix issues identified in the expert review done by jaster on our installation instructions Confirmed 2013-09-28

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri 2013-10-04 09:06:38

  • Category set to Persistence
  • Starter set to No

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2013-11-02 09:20:41

  • Priority changed from Normal to Low

(As proposed in the “Quarterly tickets gardening: outcome and proposals” thread on tails-dev.)

#3 Updated by BitingBird 2014-06-09 12:09:07

  • Subject changed from persistence: categorized presets to Persistence: categorized presets

#4 Updated by BitingBird 2015-01-07 18:08:53

  • Type of work changed from Code to User interface design

Changing type of work to UX, because the different categories must first be decided :)

#5 Updated by BitingBird 2015-03-14 14:03:26

I would say:

- Personal data

- GNOME Keyring

- Network Connections

- Printers

- Pidgin

- Browser bookmarks

- Bitcoin Client

- Claws Mail

- GnuPG

- SSH Client

- Dotfiles

- APT Packages

- APT Lists
- Additional software packages (ideally fusionned with 2 previous ones)

I don’t really think categories are necessary, but the order in which they appear could be changed to be more coherent.

#6 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-18 15:33:04

@sajolida: is this still something you consider doing? -In particular with regard to the expert review from Feature #14548? If not, we could reject this ticket.

#7 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-18 15:34:37

  • related to Feature #14548: Fix issues identified in the expert review done by jaster on our installation instructions added

#8 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-18 15:37:18

  • Assignee set to sajolida
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

#9 Updated by sajolida 2018-01-21 12:12:16

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected
  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)

Nah :)

I still think that the persistence config is part of the few central piece of hardware of Tails that have never seen in depth UX tests or review but I’m fine with rejecting the ideas we had so far until we have a better idea of what to do with it.