Bug #16663

apparmor / torbrowser_plugin_container

Added by jayz1 2019-04-18 12:40:32 . Updated 2019-05-08 15:40:18 .

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
jayz1
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Discuss
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

audit[]: AVC apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“file_receive” profile=“torbrowser_plugin_container” name=“/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled” pid=xxx comm=57656220436F6E74656E74 requested_mask=“r” denied_mask=“r” fsuid=1000 ouid=0

kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(xxxxxx.xx): apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“file_receive” profile=“torbrowser_plugin_container” name=“/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled” pid=xxx comm=57656220436F6E74656E74 requested_mask=“r” denied_mask=“r” fsuid=1000 ouid=0

audit[]: AVC apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“mkdir” profile=“torbrowser_firefox” name=“/usr/local/lib/tor-browser/TorBrowser/Data/Browser/.mozilla/” pid=xxx comm=“firefox.real” requested_mask=“c” denied_mask=“c” fsuid=1000 ouid=1000

kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(xxxxxx.xx): apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“mkdir” profile=“torbrowser_firefox” name=“/usr/local/lib/tor-browser/TorBrowser/Data/Browser/.mozilla/” pid=xxx comm=“firefox.real” requested_mask=“c” denied_mask=“c” fsuid=1000 ouid=1000

not sure what is going on here, can some explain?

Subtasks

History

#1 Updated by mercedes508 2019-04-18 13:21:42

  • Assignee set to jayz1

Well in terms of explaining, you just dropped some line of logs, not sure this helps anyone understand you possible issue.

So please give use some context, steps to reproduce.

#2 Updated by jayz1 2019-04-18 13:57:40

mercedes508 wrote:
> Well in terms of explaining, you just dropped some line of logs, not sure this helps anyone understand you possible issue.
>
> So please give use some context, steps to reproduce.

it is exactly like this issue here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403553

#4 Updated by mercedes508 2019-04-19 11:49:07

Still you’re not explaining…

I tried to go to chillmo.com & rpmfusion.org as said on the redhat ticket and didn’t get any error.

It looks like you’re looking at AppArmor logs without properly understanding their meaning, and thus converting any DENIED message into an error, which is not the case.

#5 Updated by mercedes508 2019-05-08 15:40:18

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

Closing it for now because of lack of answer from OP.