Bug #16240
proofread/review test.mdwn
0%
Description
While preparing 3.11, I noticed the “It’s design” typo in wiki/src/contribute/release_process/test.mdwn
so I took another look later.
Also “such is” → “such as”.
I’ve noticed the ifconfig | grep inet | grep -v inet6 | cut -d" " -f2 | tail -n1
instruction which can’t work since we don’t have net-tools
in Tails, and I’ve checked that there’s no ifconfig
wrapper. I’m getting an empty string on stretch anyway…
What about this? ip a|awk '/inet / {print $2}' | tail -n1
We get an extra subnet mask though, e.g. 10.0.2.15/24
but 1. it can be sed
’d out, and 2. that’s still better than “ifconfig: command not found”?
Also:
1. Then check that email's headers once received, especially the
`Received:` one.
one→ones? (There are likely several of them.)
Also I don’t really understand what is meant here: « * Call the upgrader must be called, […] ”
Also double is here: “The goal is is to check”.
I’m attaching a partial patch for the issues that seem obvious to me.
Files
Subtasks
History
#1 Updated by mercedes508 2018-12-23 17:16:22
- Status changed from New to Confirmed
#2 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2019-01-02 18:06:23
- Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
Applied in changeset commit:tails|6a5aaa6c4f8851f1138ec4cdce0eeda4f8cdee93.
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2019-01-02 18:11:24
- Assignee set to CyrilBrulebois
- QA Check set to Ready for QA
> I’ve noticed the ifconfig | grep inet | grep -v inet6 | cut -d" " -f2 | tail -n1
instruction
It’s not a command testers must run: it’s literally what the website should display. Clarified with commit:910fc89b7598a53ea253b1cbf0327c73debbf64b to avoid confusion.
>
> 1. Then check that email's headers once received, especially the
> `Received:` one.
>
> one→ones? (There are likely several of them.)
This will probably go away with Bug #15914 but still, fixed with commit:01f1c3390ab739e8af79e968ea1b64aa5fe3a8ed.
> Also I don’t really understand what is meant here: « * Call the upgrader must be called, […] ”
commit:bcbe9050d2f83ef3e1f86afc57e6492041ae804c
> I’m attaching a partial patch for the issues that seem obvious to me.
Applied, thanks!
Please review my fixes, which I pushed straight to the master branch given how trivial that was.
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2019-06-02 14:42:57
- Status changed from In Progress to Needs Validation
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-30 20:34:03
- Status changed from Needs Validation to Resolved
I’ve seen no issue reported since these changes were made 8 months ago, so I’ll assume that’s good enough.