Bug #16060

Improve ASP code: configuration window

Added by Anonymous 2018-10-16 13:40:49 . Updated 2020-03-08 18:59:12 .

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2018-10-16
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
bugfix/16060-improve-asp-conf-window
Type of work:
Code
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Additional Software Packages
Deliverable for:
319

Description

Reported from Bug #15838

configuration-window.ui:

Maybe remove the install_label text, because it’s overwritten in update_packages_list() anyway


Subtasks


Related issues

Related to Tails - Bug #15838: Fix non-blocking issues identified during ASP code review Resolved 2018-09-26
Related to Tails - Bug #16226: Most branches FTBFS on Jenkins since the 3.11 release Resolved 2018-12-15
Related to Tails - Feature #14568: Additional Software Packages Resolved 2013-12-11 2018-06-26

History

#1 Updated by Anonymous 2018-10-16 13:40:58

  • related to Bug #15838: Fix non-blocking issues identified during ASP code review added

#2 Updated by Anonymous 2018-10-16 13:42:52

  • Subject changed from Improve ASP code to Improve ASP code: configuration window
  • Deliverable for set to 319

#3 Updated by Anonymous 2018-10-16 13:46:07

  • Target version set to Tails_3.11

#4 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2018-12-16 14:04:00

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.11 to Tails_3.12

#5 Updated by alant 2018-12-16 17:26:12

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress

Applied in changeset commit:tails|4fec7de061b5ea8c4b04dd2bdd80f7003653cc82.

#6 Updated by alant 2018-12-16 17:43:35

  • QA Check set to Ready for QA
  • Feature Branch set to bugfix/16060-improve-asp-conf-window

#7 Updated by alant 2018-12-16 17:44:05

  • related to Bug #16226: Most branches FTBFS on Jenkins since the 3.11 release added

#8 Updated by anonym 2019-01-30 11:59:20

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.12 to Tails_3.13

#9 Updated by intrigeri 2019-03-17 09:16:11

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.13 to Tails_3.14

Even if this was submitted today, we would not have the reviewer resources to merge it in time for 3.13.

#10 Updated by Anonymous 2019-03-25 17:12:01

@alant: is this ready for QA for intrigeri?

#11 Updated by intrigeri 2019-04-17 06:40:37

> alant: is this ready for QA for intrigeri?

u, I think alant uses “Ready for QA” + “keep assigned to himself” as a way to express something along the lines of “I believe I’ve resolved it, next step is to build, test, and confirm the problem it actually solved”.

#12 Updated by Anonymous 2019-05-16 15:05:30

I’m deleting the parent ticket, because I want to close the ASP project. Please let me know when you’ll work on this again, without urgency.

#13 Updated by Anonymous 2019-05-16 15:05:46

#14 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2019-05-23 21:23:29

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.14 to Tails_3.15

#15 Updated by intrigeri 2019-06-02 14:30:34

  • QA Check deleted (Ready for QA)

(Preparing to drop the “QA Check” field as per “[Tails-dev] Proposal: Redmine workflow change”.)

#16 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 2019-07-10 10:34:09

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.15 to Tails_3.16

#17 Updated by intrigeri 2019-08-30 17:30:29

  • Target version deleted (Tails_3.16)

Hi!

We’ve set up an automated process to ask our fellow contributors to update some tickets of theirs, in order to:

  • better reflect your plans;
  • bring down your amount of work-in-progress to a sustainable level;
  • encourage team work and increase the chances that someone finishes the work;
  • avoid a human doing ticket triaging and asking you the same questions on each such ticket.

In particular, this process identifies:

  • Stalled work-in-progress
  • Reviews waiting for a long time

However, in the current state of things, this process is not able to notice those tickets when their Target version has been repeatedly postponed by our Release Managers. Therefore, the ticket triaging team decided on Feature #16545 to remove the Target version whenever in such cases, when it does not feel realistic. This is what I’m doing on this ticket.

You now have a few options, such as:

  • Deassign yourself. That’s fine. If it really matters, someone else, possibly you, may pick it up later. Then, if this ticket is relevant for a Tails team, bring it to their attention; else, forget it and take care of yourself :)
  • If you think you can realistically come back to it and finish the work in the next 6 months, say so on this ticket, for example by setting a suitable “Target version”. This will communicate your plans to the rest of the project and ensure the task pops up on your radar at a suitable time. Of course, you can still realize later that it is not going to work as planned, and revisit today’s choice.

Cheers!

#18 Updated by alant 2020-03-08 18:47:54

  • Assignee deleted (alant)

#19 Updated by alant 2020-03-08 18:59:12

  • Status changed from In Progress to Rejected

As this ticket was a “maybe”, I propose to reject it.