Feature #15870
Evaluate OpenQA
Start date:
2018-08-30
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Description
Evaluate OpenQA as a replacement for our Cucumber + Sikuli + dogtail test suite framework.
Team:
- intrigeri lists the nice things our current setup gives us, starting with:
- Running tests locally
- Integration with other CI like Jenkins
- Test suite code lives in the same repo as the code with branching support
- lamby does the evaluation
Questions:
- What’s better with OpenQA compared to what we have?
- What’s missing in OpenQA compared to what we have?
Resources:
Subtasks
History
#1 Updated by nodens 2018-08-30 15:07:50
- blocks
Feature #14585: Investigate Dogtail's long-term viability added
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-14 08:32:31
- blocks
Bug #15953: Make our test suite survive changes in the surrounding environment added
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-14 08:32:43
- Description updated
- Target version set to 2019
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-14 08:32:54
- blocked by deleted (
)Feature #14585: Investigate Dogtail's long-term viability
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-14 08:34:43
- Description updated
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2018-12-25 10:09:58
- Description updated
#7 Updated by intrigeri 2019-04-13 08:26:55
- blocks Feature #16209: Core work: Foundations Team added
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2019-04-14 07:27:13
- Assignee deleted (
intrigeri)
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2019-09-20 06:42:26
- Description updated
#10 Updated by hefee 2019-12-13 15:20:52
- Target version changed from 2019 to 2020
We will reevualte if we have more data from Bug #15460.
#11 Updated by intrigeri 2020-03-21 18:55:25
Now that Bug #15460 saved the day by dropping Sikuli, I personally don’t think we should pursue the OpenQA hypothesis further.
#12 Updated by intrigeri 2020-03-21 18:59:16
- blocked by deleted (
Feature #16209: Core work: Foundations Team)
#13 Updated by intrigeri 2020-04-16 08:59:33
- blocked by deleted (
)Bug #15953: Make our test suite survive changes in the surrounding environment