Feature #15669

Avoid naming GNOME core apps by their common noun name

Added by sajolida 2018-06-18 15:43:09 . Updated 2018-09-05 16:21:27 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2018-06-18
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
befcec1e48
Type of work:
End-user documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:
299

Description

During the user testing of the VeraCrypt beta, participants had a hard time understanding what Files and Disks refer to.

As we were also dealing with encrypted file containers and disk partitions and I used very short section titles (“Using Files” and “Using Disks”), the confusion was maximum. But I think understood that these naming are not clear enough when using in the context of documentation and would highly gain from being clarified.

I think that using a longer and more descriptive name would help, for example:

  • the Files browser
  • the Disks utility

I’ll also consider adding the logo of the application as it appears in the activities overview.

We should also add this to our documentation style guide.


Subtasks


History

#1 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-18 15:44:59

  • Subject changed from Avoid naming GNOME core apps by the common noun name to Avoid naming GNOME core apps by their common noun name

#2 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-18 15:46:41

  • Description updated

#3 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-18 15:47:17

  • Description updated

#4 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-20 16:27:23

  • Deliverable for set to 299

#5 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-25 16:33:40

  • Target version set to Tails_3.9

#6 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-26 18:57:44

  • Feature Branch set to befcec1e48

#7 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-26 18:57:53

  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

#8 Updated by sajolida 2018-06-28 08:02:36

  • Assignee changed from sajolida to cbrownstein

Cody agreed to review that.

#9 Updated by cbrownstein 2018-07-10 13:22:16

  • Assignee changed from cbrownstein to sajolida
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

I’ve pushed some changes but otherwise looks good.

https://0xacab.org/cbrownstein/tails/commits/doc/14476-veracrypt

(N.B. I am no longer hosting my Tails repository on GitHub.)

Changesets:
80681e70537e6c7bd5d0fbf0692d990761c5eb5a
f1f821bb04373eebf4f2464e9f1776435cee7fd2
c13abfdeb0530b08e3a8ac8d57272a13adc2edf9

#10 Updated by sajolida 2018-07-18 15:25:33

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Fix committed
  • Assignee deleted (sajolida)
  • QA Check deleted (Pass)

All good, thanks for the careful review!

#11 Updated by intrigeri 2018-09-05 16:21:27

  • Status changed from Fix committed to Resolved