Bug #13531

Use ikiwiki 3.20161219+, again

Added by intrigeri 2017-07-29 07:03:13 . Updated 2017-07-29 19:51:31 .

Build system
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:


Feature Branch:
Type of work:

Affected tool:
Deliverable for:


I did this on Feature #12051 already, but then my work was lost by some conflict merge resolution (presumably when we moved the build deps installation from one script to another). So right now our ISO build Vagrant systems use ikiwiki from Jessie, instead of from jessie-backports as intended.


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #11966: Reproducible website build Resolved 2016-11-19
Related to Tails - Feature #12051: Use ikiwiki 3.20161219+ instead of our patched one Resolved 2016-12-21


#1 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 07:04:43

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 07:04:54

  • related to Feature #12051: Use ikiwiki 3.20161219+ instead of our patched one added

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 15:09:42

  • blocked by Bug #13530: ISO builds are broken by weird enigmail situation added

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 15:10:02

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
  • % Done changed from 0 to 10
  • Feature Branch set to bugfix/13531-ikiwiki-from-jessie-backports

#5 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 18:22:23

  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to bertagaz
  • % Done changed from 10 to 50
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

Verified that the ISO still builds and the build box has ikiwiki from jessie-backports again.

#6 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 18:33:26

Oops, I forgot: before spending any time on this branch, please first check Feature #11738. If you think my plan there is not totally crazy, then forget about this branch as Feature #11738 will obsolete it.

#7 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 19:50:11

  • blocks deleted (Bug #13530: ISO builds are broken by weird enigmail situation)

#8 Updated by intrigeri 2017-07-29 19:51:31

  • Status changed from In Progress to Duplicate
  • Assignee deleted (bertagaz)
  • Target version deleted (Tails_3.1)
  • QA Check deleted (Ready for QA)

Feature #11738 is a superset of this ticket, so I’m calling it a duplicate. Sorry for the noise. Let’s come back to it if you notice any serious blocker on Feature #11738 that I’ve missed.