Bug #13483
Send a call for testing to build Tails 3.1 reproducibly to the rb-general mailing list
100%
Description
anonym will draft the technical bits of this email and u will improve the draft and send it to the rb-general mailing list just after Tails 3.1 came out.
@anonym: please reassign to u when you’ve created the draft.
Files
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2017-08-14 |
History
#1 Updated by anonym 2017-08-04 13:03:14
- File repro.mdwn added
- Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
- Assignee deleted (
anonym) - % Done changed from 0 to 30
u wrote:
> @anonym: please reassign to u when you’ve created the draft.
Attached! I suggest [[!toc levels=3]]
since it might make the “decision tree” easier to spot. :)
#2 Updated by Anonymous 2017-08-05 11:38:44
Thanks anonym.
I’ve prepared a blog post here: 451f:tails/feature/13483_blogpost.
Although I think in the beginning we were talking about an email only.
So what I will to is to send this email once 3.1 is out.
Beware: The text still needs a fix containing the SHA sum of Tails 3.1.
Then we can still decide if we want to publish this in our news too, some time later, or if we consider this to be too general public.
#3 Updated by Anonymous 2017-08-05 11:39:01
- Feature Branch set to 451f:tails/feature/13483_blogpost
#4 Updated by Anonymous 2017-08-05 11:39:12
- % Done changed from 30 to 60
#5 Updated by Anonymous 2017-08-05 11:39:35
- Priority changed from Normal to High
#6 Updated by anonym 2017-08-05 12:50:34
- Priority changed from High to Normal
- % Done changed from 60 to 30
u wrote:
> Although I think in the beginning we were talking about an email only.
Ah, that’s right! Then we might want to convert at least the markdown links to footnotes for increased readability.
> Beware: The text still needs a fix containing the SHA sum of Tails 3.1.
The RM (bertagaz, added as a watcher) is the authoritative source of this information.
> Then we can still decide if we want to publish this in our news too, some time later, or if we consider this to be too general public.
Another consideration is that we likely will get a better signal-to-noise ratio if we only aim this at the Tails developer (tails-dev@boum.org) and reproducible builds (rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org) communities. And maybe the Tor (tor-{dev,talk}@lists.torproject.org) community?
#7 Updated by bertagaz 2017-08-05 21:02:30
anonym wrote:
> u wrote:
> > Beware: The text still needs a fix containing the SHA sum of Tails 3.1.
>
> The RM (bertagaz, added as a watcher) is the authoritative source of this information.
Sent!
#8 Updated by Anonymous 2017-08-08 11:43:24
- Priority changed from Normal to High
- % Done changed from 30 to 60
Great idea anonym. Thanks bertagaz. I’ve prepared the email and I’m sort of waiting for 3.1 to be released.
#9 Updated by bertagaz 2017-08-08 18:02:35
u wrote:
> Great idea anonym. Thanks bertagaz. I’ve prepared the email and I’m sort of waiting for 3.1 to be released.
It will take a bit more time than expected: in the end, I’m rebuilding the ISO to get the Linux upgrade. I’ll send u the SHAAAAA.
#10 Updated by anonym 2017-08-14 11:05:14
- related to
Feature #13624: Analyze results of Tails 3.1 call for reproduction added
#11 Updated by anonym 2017-08-14 11:06:13
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
) - % Done changed from 60 to 100
Done: https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2017-August/011591.html
I’ve opened Feature #13624 for the follow-up analysis.