Bug #12332
Check the new version of Security-in-a-Box to update links to it from our documentation
0%
Description
A new version of Security-in-a-Box was released some months ago. We should check if we could link to it more or better from our documentation.
Subtasks
Related issues
Blocks Tails - |
Resolved | 2017-09-17 |
History
#1 Updated by sajolida 2017-04-07 15:24:00
- blocks
Feature #12432: Technical writing core work 2017Q2 added
#2 Updated by sajolida 2017-07-05 19:02:08
- blocked by deleted (
)Feature #12432: Technical writing core work 2017Q2
#3 Updated by sajolida 2017-07-05 19:02:14
- blocks
Feature #13423: Core work 2017Q3: Technical writing added
#4 Updated by sajolida 2017-10-02 18:05:49
- blocked by deleted (
)Feature #13423: Core work 2017Q3: Technical writing
#5 Updated by sajolida 2017-10-02 18:06:01
- Assignee deleted (
sajolida) - Priority changed from Normal to Low
I’ve been postponing this for 7 months and I’m systematically overclocked, so removing this from “core work”.
#6 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 13:58:01
- Subject changed from Check the new version of Security-in-a-Box for updates links for our documentation to Check the new version of Security-in-a-Box to update links to it from our documentation
#7 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 13:59:31
fgrep -r securityinabox * | grep -v $".po"
doc/anonymous_internet/pidgin.mdwn:Pidgin](https://securityinabox.org/en/pidgin_securechat).
doc/anonymous_internet/thunderbird.mdwn: - [Security-in-a-Box: Thunderbird & OpenPGP - secure email](https://securityinabox.org/en/guide/thunderbird/windows)
doc/encryption_and_privacy/manage_passwords.mdwn:of Security in-a-Box](https://securityinabox.org/en/guide/keepassx/linux/).
We have only three links to security in a box currently.
#8 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 14:00:31
- Starter set to Yes
Only the first link is outdated. The other two work.
#9 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 14:02:35
- Assignee set to sajolida
- QA Check set to Info Needed
The only remaining link here is https://securityinabox.org/en/guide/pidgin/windows/ and for Linux they now recommend using Jitsi. So we might want to remove the link in our doc altogether.
Now that I spent 5 minutes researching this, I let you make the final decision :)
#10 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 14:02:45
- Starter changed from Yes to No
#11 Updated by sajolida 2018-02-16 21:13:56
- Assignee changed from sajolida to cbrownstein
- Priority changed from Low to Normal
- QA Check changed from Info Needed to Ready for QA
- Feature Branch set to doc/12332-new-security-in-a-box
Thanks for checking the existing links!
I also quickly browse the new Security-in-a-Box in search of possibly more links to point to and I didn’t find anything else.
Cody: Would you like to review my small branch for that?
#12 Updated by sajolida 2018-02-16 21:14:12
- blocks
Feature #14758: Core work 2017Q4 → 2018Q1: Technical writing added
#13 Updated by cbrownstein 2018-02-19 10:22:31
- Assignee changed from cbrownstein to sajolida
- QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass
Everything looks good!
#14 Updated by sajolida 2018-02-19 16:28:27
- Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
sajolida) - Target version set to Tails_3.6
- QA Check deleted (
Pass)
Merged as well.