Feature #11681
Decide if/how we want plausible deniability for the persistent volume
Start date:
2016-08-20
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Description
Decide if we want it, research the legal perspectives, etc.
(At the Tails summit 2016, we added this task to our roadmap, but nobody could volunteer so this has no target version.)
Subtasks
Related issues
|
Related to Tails - |
Rejected | 2018-06-18 | |
|
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2016-04-14 | 2019-01-29 |
| Related to Tails - Bug #10803: Network Connections persistence feature stores MAC address of network interface | Confirmed | 2015-12-29 | |
|
Related to Tails - |
Rejected | 2018-09-11 | |
|
Related to Tails - |
Duplicate |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2016-08-23 00:23:58
- Description updated
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2018-06-14 13:10:07
Note that Feature #15292 may change our perspective on this, in one way or another.
#3 Updated by Gaff 2018-06-18 11:18:43
- related to
Feature #15662: Don't require encrypted partitions to be labelled "TailsData" in the GPT table. added
#4 Updated by Anonymous 2018-08-17 15:27:21
- related to
Feature #15292: Distribute a USB image added
#5 Updated by Anonymous 2018-08-18 09:53:26
- related to Bug #10803: Network Connections persistence feature stores MAC address of network interface added
#6 Updated by goupille 2018-10-16 10:27:27
- related to
Feature #15938: Persistent volume on sshfs added
#7 Updated by sajolida 2019-06-02 12:51:12
- Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected
See you on Feature #5929 directly. It’s really not clear whether we want this or so, so let’s stick to having a discussion ticket for now and Feature #5929 is where the discussion have happened until now.
#8 Updated by sajolida 2020-04-13 16:56:14
- related to
Feature #16750: Persistence Plausible Deniability on Boot added