Feature #11555
Document KVM configuration for better graphic performance
0%
Description
We could add some more information to
https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/virtualization/virt-manager/
The only KVM config in which I’ve seen acceptable graphics performance is QXL with lots of video memory (starting with Tails 2.4, as before it was hopeless).
Subtasks
Related issues
Related to Tails - |
Resolved | 2017-10-04 |
History
#1 Updated by emmapeel 2016-07-01 13:25:42
- Description updated
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2016-07-16 05:44:35
> The only KVM config in which I’ve seen acceptable graphics performance is QXL with lots of video memory (starting with Tails 2.4, as before it was hopeless).
That would be 2.5, not 2.4.
#3 Updated by sajolida 2016-11-04 12:39:41
- QA Check deleted (
Dev Needed)
#4 Updated by Anonymous 2017-06-30 13:32:16
- Assignee set to emmapeel
- QA Check set to Info Needed
What kind of information should we add there emmapeel?
#5 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 14:48:50
ping?
#6 Updated by emmapeel 2018-01-17 15:30:18
u wrote:
> ping?
No idea, some nice information to boot with KVM. Document it better.
#7 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 15:48:07
- related to
Bug #14786: Can't change resolution under KVM with QXL added
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2018-01-17 15:49:16
emmapeel wrote:
> u wrote:
> > ping?
>
> No idea, some nice information to boot with KVM. Document it better.
Better than what I’ve added in the “Troubleshooting” section of https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/virtualization/virt-manager/, or better than the “nothing at all” we had previously?
#9 Updated by Anonymous 2018-01-17 16:12:59
- Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected
IMO intrigeri’s work on Bug #14786 addresses the issue. If it doesn’t just reopen this ticket.