Feature #11447

Write design doc for the freezable APT repository

Added by intrigeri 2016-05-18 15:33:14 . Updated 2016-06-10 07:55:14 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Infrastructure
Target version:
Tails_2.5
Start date:
2016-05-18
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
feature/5926-freezable-APT-repository
Type of work:
Contributors documentation
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:
269

Description

Subtasks

Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository Resolved 2016-05-18

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-18 15:33:14

  • copied from Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository added

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-18 18:39:38

  • copied to deleted (Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository)

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-18 18:39:46

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-18 18:41:21

  • related to Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository added

#5 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-18 18:42:42

  • % Done changed from 10 to 20

I imported most of the content into wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository, but it’s a bit messy, and I want to clean it up a bit. I would also like to describe the infrastructure side of things in a little bit more details.

#6 Updated by intrigeri 2016-06-02 14:58:02

  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to bertagaz
  • % Done changed from 20 to 30
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

Actually I’ve re-read the entire thing and to me it seems it seems at least on par with our usual standards for such doc. bertagaz & anonym, can you please read it and tell me what’s missing or unclear? I’ll adjust things accordingly.

Starting points:

  • for the infra bits: wiki/src/contribute/working_together/roles/sysadmins.mdwn (I think that the Puppet code is pretty self-explaining, and the actual scripts and their usage are documented under wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository anyway)
  • for the rest of the design: wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository

#7 Updated by bertagaz 2016-06-08 06:01:34

  • Assignee changed from bertagaz to anonym
  • % Done changed from 30 to 60

intrigeri wrote:
> Actually I’ve re-read the entire thing and to me it seems it seems at least on par with our usual standards for such doc. bertagaz & anonym, can you please read it and tell me what’s missing or unclear? I’ll adjust things accordingly.
>
> Starting points:
>
> * for the infra bits: wiki/src/contribute/working_together/roles/sysadmins.mdwn (I think that the Puppet code is pretty self-explaining, and the actual scripts and their usage are documented under wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository anyway)
> * for the rest of the design: wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository

Read them, pushed a small minor syntax fix, apart from that it seems good and clear enough to me. Good documentation you did there!

Assigning to anonym, as you asked his opinion. I bet he already has read and checked most of them, shouldn’t take him long. :)

#8 Updated by anonym 2016-06-10 07:55:14

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Assignee deleted (anonym)
  • % Done changed from 60 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

Their top quality! :)