Feature #10915

Consider publishing torrents for betas and RCs

Added by anonym 2016-01-12 17:59:48 . Updated 2016-02-13 12:11:00 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Start date:
2016-01-12
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Discuss
Blueprint:

Starter:
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:

Description

What’s the rationale for us not doing this?

A good point (made by a user on #tails) is that torrents are useful for unstable connections, since modern browsers doesn’t make it very easy to resume broken downloads, whereas torrents do.


Subtasks


Related issues

Related to Tails - Bug #10781: Adapt the download of release candidates to the assistant Resolved 2016-02-13

History

#1 Updated by sajolida 2016-01-13 11:56:48

I’m all for it as it would improve on verification of test images. See https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2016-January/010071.html.

#2 Updated by intrigeri 2016-01-13 12:12:23

  • Assignee set to anonym
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

> modern browsers doesn’t make it very easy to resume broken downloads

What are you referring to?

#3 Updated by anonym 2016-01-13 13:23:40

intrigeri wrote:
> > modern browsers doesn’t make it very easy to resume broken downloads
>
> What are you referring to?

Well, mostly to whatever the users were referring to. It seems it doesn’t work so well in the Tor Browser, for instance. Try starting a download, then kill the circuit, and notice that you cannot resume the download (at least AFAICT).

#4 Updated by intrigeri 2016-01-13 14:34:50

> Well, mostly to whatever the users were referring to. It seems it doesn’t work so well in the Tor Browser, for instance.

Interesting. If it were the only argument we had in favour of the torrents, then it would be interesting to know if it’s a problem that’s specific to Tor Browser, or to the way we handle network disconnection/reconnection in Tails by restarting Tor, or to “modern browsers” in general. But apparently we have other good arguments so let’s not waste time on this :)

#5 Updated by sajolida 2016-02-03 15:46:45

  • related to Bug #10781: Adapt the download of release candidates to the assistant added

#6 Updated by sajolida 2016-02-13 12:11:00

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Resolved
  • Assignee deleted (anonym)
  • QA Check deleted (Info Needed)

Nobody seems to be against doing this :)