Feature #10492

Decide if Jenkins should test our documentation branches

Added by bertagaz 2015-11-06 04:36:02 . Updated 2015-12-05 10:07:51 .

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Continuous Integration
Target version:
Tails_1.8
Start date:
2015-11-05
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Discuss
Blueprint:

Starter:
0
Affected tool:
Deliverable for:
267

Description

During the first stage of deployment, some of us raised the question about deciding if we want our doc/ and web/ branches to be tested in Jenkins. There are pros and cons and we need to decide something about that, and the way we would implement it.

See https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2015-October/009645.html

Subtasks

Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #9760: Prioritize builds from release branches over others Confirmed 2015-07-19
Related to Tails - Feature #10707: Test only @doc scenarios for documentation branches Resolved 2015-12-03
Blocks Tails - Feature #10706: Tag scenarios that rely on the shipped documentation Resolved 2015-12-03

History

#1 Updated by bertagaz 2015-11-06 04:36:22

  • blocks #8668 added

#2 Updated by bertagaz 2015-11-06 04:37:09

  • Description updated

#3 Updated by intrigeri 2015-11-06 07:35:53

  • Starter changed from Yes to No
  • Deliverable for changed from 268 to 267

#5 Updated by bertagaz 2015-11-18 04:36:27

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from bertagaz to intrigeri
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50
  • QA Check set to Info Needed

#6 Updated by intrigeri 2015-12-01 10:57:01

Data point — in November, among 314 non-aborted ISO test suite runs, 24% (75) were about branches whose name starts with “doc” or “web”.

#7 Updated by intrigeri 2015-12-01 12:24:29

  • related to Feature #9760: Prioritize builds from release branches over others added

#8 Updated by intrigeri 2015-12-01 12:28:54

  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to bertagaz
  • % Done changed from 50 to 60
  • QA Check changed from Info Needed to Dev Needed

Replied on the ML, summed up there what’s left to do before we can close this ticket.

#9 Updated by bertagaz 2015-12-03 07:04:49

  • blocks Feature #10706: Tag scenarios that rely on the shipped documentation added

#10 Updated by bertagaz 2015-12-03 07:14:02

  • related to Feature #10707: Test only @doc scenarios for documentation branches added

#11 Updated by bertagaz 2015-12-03 07:23:19

  • Assignee changed from bertagaz to intrigeri
  • % Done changed from 60 to 80
  • QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Ready for QA

Reassigning for review as asked on the ML. See related tickets for more.

#12 Updated by intrigeri 2015-12-05 10:07:52

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Assignee deleted (intrigeri)
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass