Feature #10295
Build a list of fast and reliable HTTP mirrors
100%
Description
We need a few ones (3-5) to be put in a DNS round-robin pool that will serve as a fallback for downloads when JavaScript is disabled when visiting the download page on our website.
Subtasks
Related issues
Has duplicate Tails - |
Duplicate | 2016-03-25 | |
Blocks Tails - |
Resolved | 2016-03-25 |
History
#1 Updated by intrigeri 2015-09-28 03:48:19
- blocks #8668 added
#2 Updated by intrigeri 2015-09-28 04:57:17
- blocks
Feature #8643: Clean up the remainers of the old mirror pool setup added
#3 Updated by intrigeri 2015-10-05 13:15:56
- Target version changed from Tails_1.7 to Tails_2.3
#4 Updated by intrigeri 2016-03-25 21:26:27
- blocked by deleted (
#8668)
#5 Updated by intrigeri 2016-03-25 21:27:38
- blocked by deleted (
)Feature #8643: Clean up the remainers of the old mirror pool setup
#6 Updated by intrigeri 2016-03-25 21:28:21
- Parent task set to
Bug #7161
#7 Updated by intrigeri 2016-03-25 21:28:39
- has duplicate
Feature #11283: Find which of our mirrors should stay in the fallback DNS round-robin pool added
#8 Updated by intrigeri 2016-03-25 21:29:47
- blocks
Feature #11284: Update the DNS round-robin mirror pool to only include a few fast and reliable HTTP mirrors added
#9 Updated by intrigeri 2016-04-14 21:18:08
- Target version changed from Tails_2.3 to Tails_2.4
#10 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-04 09:50:04
- Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
[moved research to https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/HTTP_mirror_pool/#speed]
#11 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-04 10:41:54
sajolida will give me a list of mirrors that are slower than 5.0MB/s, if I ask him in a week. From that I can proceed by elimination and hopefully there will be enough fast mirrors left. If not, then we’ll need to decrease a bit the threshold, and if that’s not enough we can still rely on Feature #11079 to get us a few new fast mirrors.
#12 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-05 10:07:02
sajolida: a dozen of our mirrors gave me more than 5 MB/s today, so I think you should bump the threshold above, e.g. to 8 or 10 MB/s, otherwise we’ll have a too big list :) I’m doing more tests and will confirm later today what value I think you should use, but if you see this comment you can already go up to 8.
#13 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-06 01:54:32
- Blueprint set to https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/HTTP_mirror_pool/#speed
#14 Updated by sajolida 2016-05-06 06:44:07
Bumped to 100MB, I want all the stats!
#15 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-13 01:12:58
- % Done changed from 10 to 20
Added sajolida’s stats to the blueprint, I will now retry some measurements and ask a few others to our friend who has a well-connected server in Germany, and then I should have enough data to pick a few mirrors from the list.
#16 Updated by intrigeri 2016-05-16 11:40:42
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Assignee deleted (
intrigeri) - % Done changed from 20 to 100
I’ve selected 5 of them on the blueprint (“Fast & reliable enough mirrors” section), so I think we’re done here.